THE ROVING EYE
Will Russia, Germany save Europe from war?
By Pepe Escobar
Are the United States, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and Russia on a
mad spiral leading to yet another war in Europe? Is it inevitable? Far from it.
The US-propelled vassal currently starring in the oligarch dance in Ukraine,
Petro Poroshenko, last week advanced the proposition that Ukrainians in the near
future, after his "reforms", will be asked to vote on whether to join NATO.
Let's be serious here. Many of you will be familiar with the concept of "shatter
belt" - territories and peoples that historically have been squeezed between the
Germanic Eagle and the Russian Bear.
As we stand, the whole shatter belt - apart from Ukraine and
Belarus - has signed up to NATO. A new Berlin wall, this time US-built - from
the Baltics to the Black Sea now runs through Kiev. Were Ukraine to become a
NATO member in an albeit remote future, the shatter belt buffer zone would
disappear. This means NATO - essentially the US - planted right on Russia's
western border.
Washington has just announced that it will be pre-positioning more military
vehicles in Europe to be used in exercises or "potential military operations".
This is perfectly in tune with the relentless US Think Tankland spin that NATO
and the US will be "forced" to balance their commitment to security in Eastern
Europe against potential Russian "aggression".
As Ukraine, the Baltic states and Poland persist in compounded hysteria about
such "aggression", the option of a post-MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction)
US-Russia nuclear war, terrifying as it must be, is now - casually - back on the
discussion table. At least there's a countercurrent: strands of informed
Americans are wondering why the US should be paying for Europe's defense when
European GDP is larger than that of the US.
Wanna play war, boy?
Now for the "threat" of nuclear war in Europe - bogus or otherwise. It's
pointless to compare the strategic nuclear capabilities of the US and Russia
based on numbers, but not on quality.
Take the compounded GDP of US, Germany, France and the UK and compare it to
Russia; it's a victory by landslide. Then examine the strategic nuclear
scenario, and it's a totally different story. GDP alone does not "win" anything.
Washington/Wall Street elites are now deep into nuclear war paranoia. A Council
on Foreign Relations study basically "found out" what Pravda had
already reported. Other pieces such as thisat
least hint at the obvious - glaring US strategic shortcomings.
Consider some of the basics:
Russian ICBMs armed with MIRVs travel at about 18 Mach; that is way faster
than anything in the US arsenal. And basically they are unbeatable.
The S-400 and S-500 double trouble. Moscow has agreed to sell the S-400
surface-to-air missile system to China. The bottom line is this will make
Beijing impermeable to US air power, ICBMs and cruise missiles. Russia, for its
part, is already focusing on the state-of-the-art S-500 - which essentially
makes the Patriot anti-missile system look like a V-2 from World War II.
The Russian Iskander missile travels at Mach 7 - with a range of 400
kilometers, carrying a 700 kilogram warhead of several varieties, and with a
circular error probability of around five meters. Translation: an ultimate
lethal weapon against airfields or logistic infrastructure. The Iskander can
reach targets deep inside Europe.
And then there's the Sukhoi
T-50 PAK FA. Talk about a real near-future game-changer.
NATO clowns dreaming of a war on Russia would have to come up with an ironclad
system to knock out the Iskanders. They don't have any. Additionally, they would
have to face the S-400s, which the Russians can deploy all over the spectrum.
Think of a hefty batch of S-400s positioned at the enclave of Kaliningrad; that
would turn NATO air operations deep inside Europe into an absolutely horrendous
nightmare. On top of it, good ol' NATO fighter jets cost a fortune. Imagine the
effect of hundreds of destroyed fighter jets on a European Union already
financially devastated and austerity-plagued to death.
As if this was not enough, no one knows the exact extent of NATO's strategic
capabilities. Brussels is not talking. Extra-officially, these capabilities are
not exactly a marvel. And Russian intelligence knows it.
Still assuming those NATO clowns would insist on playing war, Moscow has already
made it very clear Russia would use their awesome arsenal of 5,000-plus tactical
nuclear weapons - and whatever else it takes - to defend the nation against a
NATO conventional attack. Moreover, a few thousand S-400 and S-500 systems are
enough to block a US nuclear attack.
None of this hair-raising Apocalypse Now scenario is even taking into account
the Russia-China alliance - the major, game-changing Eurasian story of the
2010s.
Just in case the "pivoting to Asia" gang starts harboring funny ideas about the
Middle Kingdom as well, China is massively investing in bouncing lasers off
satellites; satellite-hitting missiles; silent submarines that surface beside US
aircraft carriers without prior detection; and a made-in-China anti-missile
missile that can hit a reentering satellite moving faster than any ICBM.
In a nutshell, Beijing knows the US surface fleet is obsolete - and undefendable.
And needless to add, all of these Chinese modernizing developments are
proceeding way faster than anything in the US.
A modest proposal
The spin by the Washington establishment has been relentless: Russia is
expanding towards a 21st century empire.
Here, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov explains in detail how this is
undiluted rubbish. What has actually happened is that Moscow deftly called the
Brzezinski-inspired bluff in Ukraine - with all its overtones. No wonder the Empire
of Chaos is furious.
And yet there is a solution to defuse the current, hysterical rush to war logic. HereI
have examined in some detail how Washington is playing Russian Roulette. Now
it's time to advance a modest proposal - as it has been floated by a few
concerned analysts from the US, Germany and Asia.
Essentially, it's very simple. It's up to Germany. And it's all about undoing
Stalin.
Stalin, at the outset of World War II, took East Prussia from Germany and moved
the eastern part of Poland into Ukraine. Eastern Ukraine was originally from
Russia; it is part of Russia and was given by Lenin to Ukraine.
So let's have East Prussia returned to Germany; the eastern part of Poland
returned to Poland; and eastern Ukraine as well as Crimea - which Khrushchev
gave to Ukraine - returned to Russia.
Everyone get their share. No more Stalin. No more arbitrary borders. That's what
the Chinese would define as a "triple win" situation. Of course, the Empire of
Chaos would fight it to death; there would be no more chaos manipulated to
justify a crusade against bogus Russian "aggression".
The ball is in Germany's court. Now it's up to East Prussians to present the
facts to Angela Merkel. Let's see if she's able to get the message.
Pepe Escobar's new book, just out, is Empire
of Chaos. Follow him on Facebook.
Pepe Escobar is the author
of Globalistan:
How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble
Books, 2007), Red
Zone Blues: a snapshot of Baghdad during the surge (Nimble
Books, 2007), and Obama
does Globalistan (Nimble
Books, 2009).
He may be reached at pepeasia@yahoo.com.
(Copyright 2014 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please
contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)